JP flag

Top Freight Forwarders in Japan (2026)

Performance-ranked logistics providers operating in Japan

1Ranked
2Featured
45Directory

Top Ranked in Japan

1 forwarders

Rankings by Shipzy, based on measured RFQ response times, quote quality, and peer endorsements — not paid placement. How rankings work · About Shipzy

Rank
Operator
Performance
Services
Action
#1
24hAvg Response
44/100Score
35/100Quote Quality
2Benchmark RFQs
Ocean Freight (FCL & LCL) #1FCL (Full Container Load) #1LCL (Less than Container Load) #1+8

Rankings are earned through measured performance, never bought. Operating in Japan? Apply to get ranked and compete for the #1 position.

Freight Forwarders Directory

(Yellow Pages)

Unranked listings. Claim your profile to verify details and get discovered.

Browse all 45 companies in Japan

Showing 120 of 45 listings

Operating in Japan?

Join the ranking and get discovered by shippers looking for logistics partners.

Apply for Ranking

Explore Other Regions

Japan ocean freight by the numbers

Last updated:

Shipzy samples 33 port-to-port lanes for Japan, on which 7 ocean carriers publish schedules, connecting 17 countries.

The fastest scheduled transit is 2 days, the median scheduled transit is 35 days, and 9 in 10 sampled sailings complete within 56 days.

32% of the 206 sampled sailings are direct; the remainder route via a transshipment hub.

The VGM cutoff falls a median of 3 days before departure, across 156 sampled sailings.

Figures describe 222 sailings sampled from 7 carrier APIs, last refreshed 17 July 2026.

7Carriers sampledCMA CGM, COSCO, Hapag-Lloyd, MSC, Maersk, ONE, ZIM
76.1%Of global fleet capacityCombined TEU share of those carriers
33Port-to-port lanesAcross 222 sampled sailings
17Countries connectedMost lanes: US, CN, SG
2 daysFastest transitShortest scheduled port-to-port time
35 daysMedian transit90th percentile 56 days
32%Direct sailingsRest route via a transshipment hub
42Named servicesDistinct carrier service loops
100Vessels seenDistinct vessel names in sampled sailings

Cutoff lead times in Japan

Median days between each cutoff and vessel departure, across sampled sailings. Carrier-estimated cutoffs are excluded.
CutoffMedian days before departureSailings sampled
Documentation cutoff4157
Port cutoff455
Dangerous goods cutoff4131
Reefer cutoff3122
VGM cutoff3156
Cargo cutoff3102
Terminal cutoff267

Most-sampled trade lanes from Japan

Partner countryLanes sampled
US6
CN5
SG3
AE2
AU2
How these numbers are measured

Figures come from the ocean schedule APIs Shipzy integrates with: CMA CGM, COSCO, Hapag-Lloyd, MSC, Maersk, ONE, ZIM. They describe the lanes Shipzy samples, not every sailing serving Japan.

The nightly sync sweeps nine global hub ports plus a set of regional template lanes, storing up to three sailings per lane, and refreshes one country per night. So coverage leans towards intercontinental routings, and the as-of date above can be several weeks old for smaller markets.

Transit figures are medians rather than averages, so a few multi-transshipment routings cannot distort them. Cutoff lead times exclude carrier-estimated cutoffs and any lead outside a 0–21 day window. Emissions figures are not published here, because only one carrier reports measured CO2; the rest are modelled from transit time and would restate transit days as emissions.

  • Carriers sampled: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026.
  • Of global fleet capacity: Sum of each sampled carrier’s share of global container capacity. Describes the carriers, not this country’s market share.
  • Port-to-port lanes: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026.
  • Countries connected: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026.
  • Fastest transit: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026.
  • Median transit: Median of 222 scheduled transit times. Median, not mean — a few multi-transshipment routings would distort an average.
  • Direct sailings: Share of 206 sampled sailings with no transshipment. Carriers count legs slightly differently, so treat as indicative.
  • Named services: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026.
  • Vessels seen: Derived from ocean schedules published by 7 carrier APIs, as of 17 July 2026. Counted by vessel name, so spelling variants may inflate this slightly.

Logistics Overview

Japan is the world’s fourth-largest economy, served by an efficient multi-port system — Tokyo, Yokohama, Nagoya, Kobe, and Osaka — and premium air gateways at Narita and Kansai.

Infrastructure Advantage

Port choice follows the industrial geography: Tokyo/Yokohama for the Kanto consumer belt, Nagoya for the automotive heartland (Toyota country), Kobe/Osaka for Kansai. Customs is fast and predictable; the challenge is precision — Japanese consignees expect exact documentation and on-time delivery as a baseline.

Sea Ports

Major seaports and maritime logistics hubs

Port of Tokyo

JP TYO
Specialization

Consumer imports for the Kanto region

Port of Yokohama

JP YOK
Specialization

Major container gateway; deep-water terminals

Port of Nagoya

JP NGO
Specialization

Japan’s largest port by tonnage; automotive exports

Port of Kobe

JP UKB
Specialization

Kansai container hub

Port of Osaka

JP OSA
Specialization

Kansai consumer imports

Air Freight

Air cargo hubs and handling services

Narita International Airport

NRT
Strategic RolePrimary international air cargo hub

Kansai International Airport

KIX
Strategic RoleWestern Japan air cargo gateway

Carrier Offices & Terminals

Live

Major shipping lines with local presence

Booking Offices

Maersk

Kobe - jp

Kobe

Local Information →
Maersk

Nagoya - jp

Nagoya

Local Information →
Maersk

Osaka - jp

Osaka

Local Information →
Maersk

Tokyo - jp

Tokyo

Local Information →

Maersk Terminals & Ports

MaerskJPHMD

Hamada Terminal

Hamada

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Pi-D Nisshin

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Rokko 6-7

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kob Sea-Land Terminal

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Leasing Port Island

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Port Island Pc-13

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

KOBE TERMINAL PC-18

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Terminal PC-16-17

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

KOBE ROKKO TERMINAL RC-2

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Terminal PC-14/15

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Rokko Wx Mitsubishi Kmtc

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Port Anchorage

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Rokko-Island Pier

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Rokko Terminal

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kawasaki-Kisen Cont. Terminal PC-3

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Terminal PC-2

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Portislan Pier

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kob China Feeders

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kamigumi Co Ltd Kobe Branch

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Pl-3

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Portisland

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Kobe Rokko C4

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPUKB

Pc-16/17 Mitsui

Kobe

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPKCZ

Kochi CY

Kochi

Find Terminal →
MaerskJPOTK

Otake CY

Otake

Find Terminal →

Shipping Schedules

Live ocean freight routes from carrier schedules

Updated 17 Jul 2026
Trade Lane
Carrier
Service Lines
Type
Transit
Next Departure
BUSANYOKOHAMA
Hapag-Lloyd
TPM
Direct
2d~0.074t CO2
27 Jul
YOKOHAMABUSAN
Hapag-Lloyd
WC5
Direct
2d~0.074t CO2
17 Jul
BUSANYOKOHAMA
Hapag-Lloyd
TPM
Direct
2d~0.074t CO2
3 Aug
Shanghai Pudong Intl ContainerHonmoku BC
Maersk
SK1
Direct
2d~0.074t CO2
18 Jul
BUSANYOKOHAMA
Hapag-Lloyd
TPM
Direct
2d~0.074t CO2
25 Jul
Busan new port terminal Co.ltdMaersk Yokohama terminal
Maersk
691
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
8 Aug
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
3d~0.112t CO2
23 Jul
YOKOHAMABUSAN
Hapag-Lloyd
WC5
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
24 Jul
ShanghaiYokohama
ZIM
QJ2
3d~0.112t CO2
18 Jul
Maersk Yokohama terminalYANGSHAN SGH GUANDONG TERMINAL
Maersk
A06
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
3 Aug
Busan new port terminal Co.ltdMaersk Yokohama terminal
Maersk
691
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
24 Jul
Maersk Yokohama terminalYANGSHAN SGH GUANDONG TERMINAL
Maersk
A06
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
27 Jul
Shanghai Pudong Intl ContainerHonmoku BC
Maersk
SK1
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
27 Jul
BUSANYOKOHAMA
MSC
FZ
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
10 Aug
YOKOHAMABUSAN
Hapag-Lloyd
WC5
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
31 Jul
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
3d~0.112t CO2
23 Jul
BUSANYOKOHAMA
MSC
FZ
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
3 Aug
Busan new port terminal Co.ltdMaersk Yokohama terminal
Maersk
691
Direct
3d~0.112t CO2
31 Jul
ShanghaiYokohama
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
17 Jul
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
21 Jul
ShanghaiYokohama
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
17 Jul
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
21 Jul
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
21 Jul
YOKOHAMABUSAN
MSC
HI
Direct
4d~0.149t CO2
13 Aug
YOKOHAMABUSAN
MSC
FZ
Direct
4d~0.149t CO2
9 Aug
BUSANYOKOHAMA
MSC
HI
Direct
4d~0.149t CO2
9 Aug
YOKOHAMABUSAN
MSC
FZ
Direct
4d~0.149t CO2
16 Aug
YokohamaShanghai
ZIM
QJ2
4d~0.149t CO2
21 Jul
YOKOHAMANINGBO
Hapag-Lloyd
WC4
Direct
5d~0.186t CO2
29 Jul
Maersk Yokohama terminalBusan new port terminal Co.ltd
Maersk
I88
Direct
5d~0.186t CO2
1 Aug

Last updated: 17 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about logistics in Japan

Which Japanese port should I ship to?+

Match the port to the consignee region: Tokyo or Yokohama for Kanto, Nagoya for Chubu/automotive, Kobe or Osaka for Kansai. Inland drayage is efficient but not cheap, so the right first port matters.

How long does sea freight from China to Japan take?+

Very short — typically 2–7 days port to port from Shanghai or other main Chinese ports.

How long does shipping from Japan to Europe or the US take?+

Roughly 30–40 days to North Europe and 10–14 days to the US West Coast port to port.

Is customs clearance difficult in Japan?+

No — it is fast and rules-based, with AEO programs widely used. Delays almost always trace to documentation inconsistencies rather than the authorities.

How do I find a reliable freight forwarder in Japan?+

Use the ranked list on this page; measured response time and quote completeness are strong signals in a market where service precision is the differentiator.